Monday, February 26, 2007

By special request....Could this be YOU?

Well, Samer did ask. In February, Samer became the second reader of the blog to visit Kuwait. Do you know what was on the top of his list of things to do? That's right, see some goats. Samer did, of course, get some action:




At the beginning, the goat was quite happy to make Samer's acquaintance. Unfortunately, he was later distracted and showed his preference for hanging out with other goats:



In the end though, the animals in Kuwait did their best to please Samer, especially the bear he met at the airport:


Samer tells me that he misses the goats and bears of Kuwait very much, and he writes to them regularly from Dubai, inviting them to visit. So, the next time you come to Kuwait, bring a camera, and get ready to get some goat on your finger tips! This could be you!!

Samer: you're losing hair my man, do something about it.

Saturday, February 24, 2007

Free Kareem

Sometimes it seems I live in a cave...then again, every time I leave that cave, it seems thing are much, much worse in the outside world:

http://www.freekareem.org

It's hard to imagine Egypt becoming any worse than it is now, but if the situation highlighted above is not rectified, it will be.

Friday, February 23, 2007

Miscellany

Sometimes the background to what shapes my life and thoughts doesn't follow a structured pattern, so here is a completely uncollated assortment of notes about what, I reckon, deserves some attention:

A US officer has commented that "a miscalculation by Iran could lead to war in the Gulf". As my friend Majed put it "a miscalculation by the US could lead to war in the Gulf". Well said Majed, well said.

Al Qabas brings to mind again the fallacy of the obsession over "orientalism". Al Qabas is currently printing a series of fawning book passages about the "great Gertrude Bell" who, we are told "loved the Arabs".

Yet another pundit gets it all wrong about the Middle East. How seriously can people take the claim that rich Arab kids listening to 50 Cent has some kind of political significance to it?

Finally, observe, the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Kuwait Oil Company, the State-owned organisation which oversees the production of a commodity for all citizens: see photo here
Meet, as well, Farouk Al Zanki, a member of the Board of the Kuwait Project, which is looking to find the right foreign investors to suck this country dry of its oil: see photo here

See the difference? Coincidence? Conflict of interest? You decide!!

Tuesday, February 13, 2007

A Baboon, a Caliph and and the War on Iran

OK, so back to the photo-essay format:



You should be able to see here the full, pathetic and rather disturbing spectacle of a baboon, chained, smoking a pipe and being displayed for sale. In fact, the scene pictured above is not too far away from the spot where Adam had his life-changing encounter with the goat, which was mentioned in another blog post. Animal welfare is not a subject I pretend to either know much about, or care too much for, but this kind of treatment of a high-order primate is in another league; to better deal with the rage in my mind, I allowed myself to think to another, more leisurely baboon who lived in my region of the world.

The story is told, my good friends, that Yezid ben Muawiya, the King of Syria and Caliph to all Muslims, a man of opulence remembered for his drinking binges more than anything else, kept a baboon with him at all times while receiving visitors at his Diwan. Ambassadors from the Byzantine Empire, local notables of the tribesmen of the Syrian desert and cityfolk of the Levantine Mediterranean coast, Quraishites from the Arabian peninsula and Shi'ite petitioners would seek the Caliph out for his wisdom only to be met by a baboon wearing layers of silk robes and throwing about pieces of monkey feaces at the astonished guests of the Successor to the Prophet of God, the Prince of the Faithful.

Yezid, who was Muslim in name only, would protest that the ape was, in fact, a Prince of the tribe of Israel, but that God had turned him into a baboon as a punishment for the sins of his people, as had been put down in the now-famous passages of the Koran. The hapless ape, mindless to the storms about to engulf his Umayyad sponsors and caretakers, became a hate figure of the oppressed, conquered non-Arab peoples in the newly Muslim realm, particularly the Persians. In short, we can call him, for the purposes of this post, "the Sunni Arab Baboon". My thesis is that the Sunni Arab Baboon is alive and well today, and is in fact exerting an influence on international affairs.

Now, let's suppose the Sunni Arab Baboon lives on one side of a pond. On the other side of the pond, divided by natural geography but united by a common ancestry and sharing a future, is a rather more inventive chimpanzee. The baboon and the chimpanzee have had a bad time sharing the area; the chimp was enslaved by the baboon, so then it tried to cunningly get all the baboon's tribe to be more chimp than the chimps themselves. All of this confusion led to trouble to no end in the division of shiny rocks between the chimps and baboons, which they use mostly to throw at each other but also to sell to tourists who take the shape of Neandertaals, a much larger, smellier and more brutish class of ape.

Let's suppose that the chimps decide that they're better off selling all their shiny igenous stones and using a new kind of fire-power they get from other materials for all the things they used to use the rocks for at home (firing the stoves, make cosmetics, etc). The Neandertaals know this, and they themselves have found the fire-power very useful in myriad ways, for example the way studying the fire-power improves their educational systems, makes them more productive, frees them up for other things, etc. They just don't want the chimps to get it, because they fear it will allow them to move up in the world and begin to challenge all the other apes, even the baboons, whom the Neandertaals never liked but--since the baboons are good for the neandertaals' business--need to keep happy.

Deep down inside, the baboons know that the chimps having fire-power is no skin off their noses, but then the chimps always looked down their noses at the baboons. Just find a chimp and tell him he looks like a baboon, and you'll see what I mean. The baboons, far more clever than outside appearances or even past behaviour suggest, know, in fact that the chimps might one day be persuaded to share the fire-power's gains, helping them, too, evolve and grow. The baboons are narrow-minded and short-sighted however, especially the big Chief Baboons, and so they will side with the neandertaals attacking the chimps on the other side of the pond, and possibly do some of the attacking themselves, given half the chance.

The moral of the story: We might not like Iran too much, but we'll be bloody baboons if we're not on their side.

Thursday, February 08, 2007

It's official: I am NOT a terrorist

OK, I am at least not on the "terrorist black list". Let me revise that one more time: As far as I am aware, the nice lady who works at the Mishref branch of the National Bank of Kuwait did not bother to see if I was a terrorist because, as far as I understand, I did not ask for a cheque book.
She did, however, oblige to let me use the stamp on her desk on my own paperwork:



I am now fantasizing about all the additional security clearance I will get through this. Perhaps the ability to go and visit relatives on the West Bank; maybe I could be let in to meetings of Congress. Who knows?, maybe some day I will use my little stamp-on-chit to get me into some concerts for free.

Please do answer the following questions if you do indeed know the answer:

--If a terrorist were to walk into a bank branch, declare himself to be a terrorist, but was not subsequently found on the black list seen by the teller staff, would you take his word for it?

--If someone were to come in asking for a chequeing account, but was found to be a terrorist "on the black list", is it expected of the branch's security guards to wrestle said terrorist to the ground, even if the suspect is believed to be armed and dangerous?

--Would a bank allow a terrorist to walk out with a cheque book, but perhaps with a precautionary stamp on the cheques, notifying any businesses who might receive said cheques, that a terrorist is giving them custom? This way, we could ensure that terrorists are able to live/eat/clothe themselves, but denied the ability to buy goods which they could use to harm others.

Does your local bank have one of these?